Skip to content
CLADsolve

Paper

CLAD: translating basic science to clinical practice

Evidence level: review-abstract-only

A narrative review in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, published online 9 October 2026, that proposes classifying CLAD by biological endotypes. Only the abstract was read.

As of . Primary source: Burman et al. 2026, J Heart Lung Transplant (DOI; abstract only was read).

Summary

Narrative review, not a new study. The abstract describes CLAD as the fibrotic manifestation of chronic rejection and a major barrier to long-term survival. It describes CLAD as the final common pathway of diverse alloimmune injuries, augmented by non-alloimmune insults. It names cytotoxic and senescent T cells, humoral immunity, innate immune activation, epithelial dysfunction, aspiration and dysbiosis. It proposes a shift from the clinical phenotypes BOS and RAS toward biologically defined endotypes that may better predict progression and therapeutic response. It recognises ALAD as a heterogeneous syndrome that offers a chance to characterise graft injury before irreversible fibrosis. The biomarkers named, which are donor-derived cell-free DNA, airway transcriptomic signatures, autoantibodies, epithelial injury markers and microbiome-derived signals, may aid risk stratification, patient enrichment and endotype-guided trials. Only the abstract of the source review was read; the full text was not read.

Details

doi
10.1016/j.healun.2026.10.005
pmid
42854767
authors
Burman A (Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network); Bell PT (Queensland Lung Transplant Service, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, and University of Queensland); Chambers D (Queensland Lung Transplant Service, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, and University of Queensland); Martinu T (Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, and University of Toronto; corresponding author)
journal
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
year
2026
publishedOnline
2026-10-09
articleType
narrative review

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Linked from (derived)

Known gaps in this record

  • full text of the source review not read, so the evidence, citations and level of agreement for this item are missing
  • funding and conflicts of interest of the source review not read
  • affiliations of the authors are taken from the record as described in the briefing and were not independently re-checked

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.