Skip to content
CLADsolve

Paper

Phenotyping CLAD after single lung transplant: Limits and prognostic assessment of the 2019 ISHLT classification system

Evidence level: retrospective single-centre cohort; abstract-only

In 172 single lung recipients, agreement between adjudicators on CLAD phenotype was poor (kappa 0.52), and an imaging-based classification predicted outcome better than physiological cut-offs.

As of . Primary source: Publisher record via DOI.

Summary

This retrospective study of adult first single lung transplants (2009 to 2017) had two independent adjudicators assess CLAD status and phenotype among 92 patients with a persistent FEV1 drop of at least 20 percent; 67 were diagnosed with CLAD. Interobserver agreement was moderate for CLAD diagnosis (kappa 0.69) and poor for phenotype (kappa 0.52); phenotypes were 31 BOS, 13 RAS, 2 mixed, 2 undefined and 19 unclassified. RAS was associated with higher risk of death or retransplant (HR 2.98), and RAS-like opacities on imaging were a strong predictor (HR 2.37) with the best agreement (kappa 0.73). The authors conclude that a classification relying on imaging performed better than one using published physiological cut-offs in single lung recipients.

Details

doi
10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.015
pmid
35351385
authors
Berra G, Huszti E, Levy L, Kawashima M, Fuchs E, Renaud-Picard B, Riddell P, Dias O, Rajagopala S, Ulahannan A, Ghany R, Singer LG, Tikkanen J, Martinu T
journal
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
year
2022
volume
41
issue
5
pages
599-607

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Linked from (derived)

Known gaps in this record

  • full text not read (abstract only)
  • funding statement and grant numbers
  • centre named in abstract

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.