Skip to content
CLADsolve

Bottleneck

Unclear endpoints and heterogeneous patients hinder CLAD trials

Evidence level: proposed bottleneck; synthesis of abstract-level sources; pending approval

An ISHLT consensus states that lung transplant trials have been hindered by unclear endpoints, and a preprint proposes trajectory classes for trial enrichment.

As of . Primary source: ISHLT consensus on trial endpoints (DOI).

Summary

The 2026 ISHLT consensus statement says clinical trials in lung transplantation have been hindered by a lack of clarity on the formulation and significance of endpoints beyond mortality, and developed Delphi-based recommendations including for CLAD. A 2026 preprint in two multicentre cohorts found four early FEV1 trajectory classes after probable CLAD with nine-month graft loss from 0 to 72 percent, and suggests a classification tool for trial enrichment. A prospective cohort of 745 recipients found 29.7 percent probable CLAD at 3 years with most progressing to definite CLAD. The ESOT guideline task force also emphasises urgent need for high-quality trials and standardised care pathways. The specific CLAD endpoints recommended were not read.

Details

barrier type
trial design

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Known gaps in this record

  • the CLAD endpoint recommendations themselves (full text not read)
  • primary endpoints used by each registered trial linked here

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.